Please select the domain you are interested in and choose the sorting aspect of your choice.
| Area of Policy Recommendation | Responsible Actors | Policy Recommendation | Nr. of Roadmap Action | Funding Requirements | Leagal Requirements | Research Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen-centred design | National policy makers, National legislators | Implementation of transparent OOP services in order that citizens have control of their own data | CCA.3, CCA.4 | Provide funding the implementation of transparent OOP services in order to raise citizen satisfaction and acceptance of the OOP solutions including of an EUwide secure payment system | Implement national legislation, according to the GDPR, to ensure transparent OOP services including a reliable payment system | Research activities on how OOP services can be transparent to assure that citizens have control of their own data and get notify in case of unusual access., Research activities on requirements and possible barriers for the adoption of a universal payment s |
| Data quality | National policy makers, National legislators | Identification and implementation of measures for ensuring quality of (new) data in general and for domestic data exchange | DQA.1, DQA.3 | Provide funding for multiple national projects for enhancing data quality and developing mandatory digital registries | Implement national legislation, which is in line with the GDPR and further EU law | Research in the direction to identify measures for ensuring quality of new data in order that data is correctly recorded in mandatory digital registries |
| Political Commitment | EU policy makers, EU legislators | Development of a comprehensive political commitment – expressed by an elaborated SINGLE strategy to implement OOP as one main pillar of digitalisation, based on existing proposals and action plans (e.g. E-Government Action Plan 2016-2020) | PA.1, PA.2 | Funding of research activities to gain the basis for a strategy. | Research of existing good practices and meaningful cases for OOP – ideally for cross border services. | |
| Legal Interoperability | EU policy makers, EU legislators | Clarification of OOP-requirements under the aspect of data protection law | Maybe funding of research (exploration of legal OOP-barriers) could be helpful. | Legal synchronisation on level of EU member states is necessary for cross border OOP | Data protection regulations are though the GDPR very different in the EU countries. Where some countries operate unique IDs for citizens (eg Estonia), other countries have definded legal and technical barriers to avoid cross sector data integration and da | |
| Trust and Transparency | EU policy makers, EU legislators | Implementation of an EU wide solution for the data subject’s consent of data sharing including the right to withdraw it | TTA.1, TTA.4, OA.5, OA.6 | Provide financial support for the research activities and the actual implementation | Implementation of corresponding EU-wide regulation for consent of data sharing which is in line with the GDPR | Research activities to identify appropriate solutions for the consent of data sharing and for the development of a clear concept |